[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48BF2F40.5050906@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:43:44 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: device@...ana.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: regarding major number of block extended devt
Tejun Heo wrote:
> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Note that addition /partitions/ is somewhat unlikely to be useful, since
>> existing code will have to search through random crap in sysfs to look
>> for the partition directories anyway.
>
> Currently it has to list /sys/block/DEV/DEV[-]N/. With proper
> classification, it can do /sys/block/*/partitions/*. We'll need to keep
> around symlinks at the root level. It also plays well with how other
> subsystems have been changing.
>
Yes, my point was mostly that in order to support older kernels, most
code is going to want to just access /sys/block/DEV/DEV*N/ anyway. What
I have done in my code is I do a readdir() on /sys/block/DEV and look
for subdirectories with a "dev" member.
Changing them to symlinks would actually break at least my code
(arguably bad programming on my part), since optimize by looking for
DT_DIR.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists