[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080904101936.086513fc@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 10:19:36 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for September 3
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 00:15:58 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 23:01:29 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> > I'll see if I cen reproduce the bug I'm
> > actually tring to find with E100=n.
>
> OK, this regression[*] bisects down to
Your first serious looking error:
"Module 'acpi' failed to be added to sysfs, error number -17
The system will be unstable now."
is not even connected to this area of the code.
and I can't find any meaningful description of your regression to attempt
to duplicate it on a cleaner tree without it already saying "I'm unstable"
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists