linux-kernel - Re: [GIT]: Networking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <48BFABE0.6050505@garzik.org>
Date:	Thu, 04 Sep 2008 05:35:28 -0400
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Ayaz Abdulla <aabdulla@...dia.com>
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
	tomasw@...il.com, yi.zhu@...el.com, linville@...driver.com
Subject: Re: [GIT]: Networking

Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, 4 of September 2008, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
>> Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 16:24:16 -0700 (PDT)
>>
>>> On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>>> What's so hard to understand about this?
>>> Here's a simple rule of thumb:
>>>  - if it's not on the regression list
>>>  - if it's not a reported security hole
>>>  - if it's not on the reported oopses list
>>> then why are people sending it to me?
>>>
>>> IOW, if it's just another random improvement, and you send it to me 
>>> outside of the merge window, then what is the point of the merge window? 
>> This is exactly what I've been trying to tell the Intel wireless folks
>> but they refuse to listen.
>>
>> I just won't take their stuff until they get their act in gear.
>>
>> No problem.
> 
> BTW, there are two regression fixes for forcedeth:
> 
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121894389018584&w=4
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121917167232014&w=4
> 
> that fix the regressions tracked as:
> 
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11358
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11361
> 
> respectively and both are more than 2 weeks old now.
> 
> Is there any chance to push them upstream or is there anything wrong with them?

Your patch is fine.  Since DaveM and I are gone this weekend, feel free 
to add "acked-by: jgarzik@...hat" and forward upstream to Linus and Andrew.

I thought there was some discussion about Yinghai Lu's MAC addr patch, 
though.  I'll look into it Monday, but maybe Ayaz (maintainer @ nv) 
could ack it sooner than that?

	Jeff



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/