| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1220531187.8609.217.camel@twins> Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 14:26:27 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> To: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com> Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>, mingo <mingo@...e.hu>, Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com> Subject: Re: oltp ~10% regression with 2.6.27-rc5 on stoakley machine On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 20:12 +0800, Lin Ming wrote: > > > > Thats bizarre... that just indicates the better clock, which should give > > > > better (read fairer) scheduling hurts your workload. > > > > > > > > Is there anything I can run to see if we can fix the scheduler perhaps? > > > > > > I observed schedstats of sysbench, there's more > > > "nr_failed_migrations_hot" > > > > > > 2.6.27-rc4: se.nr_failed_migrations_hot 11 > > > 2.6.27-rc5: se.nr_failed_migrations_hot 95 > > > > > > task migration failed because of task_hot, the system is un-balanced? > > > > Ah, that makes sense, a more accurate clock could indeed make more tasks > > hot. > > > > Can you try fiddling with: /proc/sys/kernel/sched_migration_cost ? > > sched_migration_cost regression > ---------------------- ------------- > 50000 ~6% > 0 ~8% > 500000 (default) ~10% > 5000000 ~14% > -1 ~19% at 50000 (~6%), is the predominant difference in schedstats still the nr_failed_migrations_hot? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists