[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080904054444.79e71974@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 05:44:44 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...x.de,
hpa@...or.org, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] Add basic sanity checks to the syscall execution patch
On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 14:01:46 +0200
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> writes:
>
> > Add basic sanity checks to the syscall execution patch
>
> This just means that the root kits will switch to patch
> the first instruction of the entry points instead.
>
> So the protection will be zero to minimal, but the overhead will
> be there forever.
>
> Now that I said this I expect it to go in yesterday.
>
I'd have considered taking your email serious if you had left out the
uncalled and unneeded sarcasm line at the end.
--
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@...ux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists