[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080904141944.GE7908@solarflare.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 15:19:46 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] pci: VPD access timeout increase
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 03:57:13PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > Accessing the VPD area can take a long time. There are comments in the
> > SysKonnect vendor driver that it can take up to 25ms. The existing vpd
> > access code fails consistently on my hardware.
>
> Wow, that's slow. If you were to try to read all 32k, it'd take more
> than three minutes! (I presume it doesn't actually have as much as 32k).
>
> > Change the access routines to:
> > * use a mutex rather than spinning with IRQ's disabled and lock held
> > * have a longer timeout
> > * call schedule while spinning to provide some responsivness
>
> I agree with your approach, but have one minor comment:
>
> > - spin_lock_irq(&vpd->lock);
> > + mutex_lock(&vpd->lock);
>
> This should be:
>
> + if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&vpd->lock))
> + return -EINTR;
[...]
This is fine for the sysfs case, but not if this is called during device
probe - we don't want signals to modprobe to break device initialisation,
do we?
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists