[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1KbGwb-0002rl-49@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 17:40:25 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: serue@...ibm.com
CC: miklos@...redi.hu, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hch@...radead.org,
viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: unprivileged mounts git tree
On Thu, 04 Sep 2008, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Sep 2008, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > Are you going to revert the change forcing CL_SLAVE for
> > !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)? I don't think we want that - I think that
> > *within* a set of user mounts, propagation should be safe, right?
> >
> > Will you be able to do this soon? If not, should we just do the part
> > returning -EPERM when turning a shared mount into a user mount?
>
> OK, let's do that first and the tricky part (propagation vs. user
> mounts) later. Will push after I've tested it.
Here it is:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mszeredi/vfs.git unprivileged-mounts
I don't know what's next, this patchset has been in and out of -mm for
as long as I can remember, but it hasn't generated much interest
outside the two of us :)
I do think this is an important feature though, even if not as sexy as
some other things.
Al? Is there any chance of this making it to 2.6.28?
Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists