[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080903201602.2ab6c449@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 20:16:02 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alok Kataria <akataria@...are.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>,
Dan Hecht <dhecht@...are.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix TSC calibration issues
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 19:56:10 -0700 (PDT)
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Alok Kataria wrote:
> >
> > As Linus suggested, we should be moving the tsc_read_refs outside
> > of the loop, this gives us more accurate TSC calibration when
> > calibrating against hpet/pmtimer, since we are now calibrating over
> > a period of 250ms.
>
> Side note: I'd like to change that.
>
> 250ms is a _loong_ time. It's a really really long time. It's
> human-noticeable. A quarter of a second at boot is just too long.
yeah it's insane ;-(
(since we boot a kernel in 1 second and a full OS including the kernel
in 5)
> - do other things while calibrating.
one option for that is the fastboot patchkit in -next ;-)
but at some point, even doing things in parallel/asynchronous isn't
helping, "parallel shit is still shit" :)
--
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@...ux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists