[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080904120522.6d5fdf8d@extreme>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 12:05:22 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Return value from schedule()
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 11:48:45 -0600
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 10:30:49AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > use schedule_hrtimerout() for this (hopefully will be in 2.6.28);
> > see this weeks LWN for an article describing it
>
> OK, so something like:
>
> struct timespec ts = { 0, 10 * 1000 };
>
> set_task_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> schedule_hrtimeout(&ts, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
> if (fatal_signal_pending())
> return -EINTR;
>
> should do the trick.
>
Never mind, I changed it to just yield() in revision.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists