[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0809041634580.3849@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 16:36:32 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
cc: mingo@...e.hu, peterz@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, npiggin@...e.de,
gregory.haskins@...il.com
Subject: Re: [TIP/SCHED/DEVEL PATCH v3 4/6] sched: add sched_class->needs_post_schedule()
member
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008, Gregory Haskins wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> index af4c6fa..ddc3877 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -2525,6 +2525,14 @@ static void finish_task_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
> {
> struct mm_struct *mm = rq->prev_mm;
> long prev_state;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> + int post_schedule = 0;
> +
> + if (current->sched_class->needs_post_schedule) {
> + BUG_ON(!current->sched_class->post_schedule);
The only one to ever hit this BUG_ON is a kernel developer creating a new
sched class. Since they should be smart enough to figure out why they get
a segv later on, we really don't need it. Because this BUG_ON is also in
a hot path, I strongly suggest nuking it.
-- Steve
> + post_schedule = current->sched_class->needs_post_schedule(rq);
> + }
> +#endif
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists