[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e9c3a7c20809041624o24af57fsbe58507a44e6e2ef@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 16:24:04 -0700
From: "Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: "Ilya Yanok" <yanok@...raft.com>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
wd@...x.de, yur@...raft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASYNC_TX: fix the bug in async_tx_run_dependencies
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 01:43:51 +0400
> Ilya Yanok <yanok@...raft.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Yuri Tikhonov <yur@...raft.com>
>>
>> Should clear the next pointer of the TX if we are sure that the
>> next TX (say NXT) will be submitted to the channel too. Overwise,
>> we break the chain of descriptors, because we lose the information
>> about the next descriptor to run. So next time, when invoke
>> async_tx_run_dependencies() with TX, it's TX->next will be NULL, and
>> NXT will be never submitted.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yuri Tikhonov <yur@...raft.com>
>
> This patch should include your signed-off-by: as well. Because you
> were on the delivery path, as described in
> Documentation/SubmittingPatches, section 12.
>
Yes, Ilya once I have your signed-off-by I will push this to Linus and
-stable. As far as impact for in-tree drivers: iop13xx by is immune,
iop3xx can hit this, and it looks like the orion5x implementation is
immune since copy and xor are available on the same channel.
--
Dan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists