[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1220510308.8609.167.camel@twins>
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 08:38:28 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] capture pages freed during direct reclaim for
allocation by the reclaimer
On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 16:00 -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Andy Whitcroft wrote:
>
> >
> > #ifndef __GENERATING_BOUNDS_H
> > @@ -208,6 +211,9 @@ __PAGEFLAG(SlubDebug, slub_debug)
> > */
> > TESTPAGEFLAG(Writeback, writeback) TESTSCFLAG(Writeback, writeback)
> > __PAGEFLAG(Buddy, buddy)
> > +PAGEFLAG(BuddyCapture, buddy_capture) /* A buddy page, but reserved. */
> > + __SETPAGEFLAG(BuddyCapture, buddy_capture)
> > + __CLEARPAGEFLAG(BuddyCapture, buddy_capture)
>
> Doesnt __PAGEFLAG do what you want without having to explicitly specify
> __SET/__CLEAR?
PAGEFLAG() __PAGEFLAG()
does TESTPAGEFLAG() double.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists