linux-kernel - Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 5/6] slab: Annotate slab

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 4 Sep 2008 10:33:54 +0300
From:	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	"Steve VanDeBogart" <vandebo-lkml@...dbox.net>
Cc:	user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ibm.com>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>, dkegel@...gle.com,
	jiayingz@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 5/6] slab: Annotate slab

Hi Steve,

On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Steve VanDeBogart
<vandebo-lkml@...dbox.net> wrote:
> But which bits of a slab object should be marked as initialized at
> kmem_cache_alloc() time?  We can't mark all of them as initialized
> because the constructor may not initialize all of them (in fact, I've
> programmatically confirmed that there are constructors that don't
> initialize all the bytes of an object).  The only place to get the
> information of interest is to mark all bytes uninitialized and then
> run the constructor on the memory region.

Aah, indeed. We should fix kmemcheck as well then.

                      Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/