linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] platform: add new device registration helper

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 5 Sep 2008 14:33:18 +0400
From:	Dmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform: add new device registration helper

On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 05:20:50PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri,  5 Sep 2008 01:30:16 +0400
> Dmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> > Add a helper that registers simple platform_device
> > w/o resources but with parent and device data.
> > 
> > This is usefull to cleanup platform code from code that
> > registers such simple devices as leds-gpio, generic-bl,
> > etc.
> > 
> 
> nits:
> 
> > + *
> > + * This function creates a simple platform device that requires minimal
> > + * resource and memory management. Canned release function freeing memory
> > + * allocated for the device allows drivers using such devices to be
> > + * unloaded without waiting for the last reference to the device to be
> > + * dropped.
> 
> Should document the return value (tested with IS_ERR)

Will the wording "Returns a valid platform device, or a valid IS_ERR
condition containing errno" be appropriate?

> > +{
> > +	struct platform_device *pdev;
> > +	int retval;
> > +
> > +	pdev = platform_device_alloc(name, id);
> > +	if (!pdev) {
> > +		retval = -ENOMEM;
> > +		goto error;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	pdev->dev.parent = parent;
> > +
> > +	if (size) {
> > +		retval = platform_device_add_data(pdev, data, size);
> > +		if (retval)
> > +			goto error;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	retval = platform_device_add(pdev);
> > +	if (retval)
> > +		goto error;
> > +
> > +	return pdev;
> > +
> > +error:
> > +	platform_device_put(pdev);
> 
> Are you sure this can't trigger a !kobj->state_initialized warning in
> kobject_put()?

No. The kobject is initialised in platform_device_alloc() ->
device_initialise()

> >
> > ...
> >
> > +extern struct platform_device *platform_device_register_data(struct device *,
> > +		const char *, int, const void *, size_t);
> 
> It's nice (IMO) to include the names of the args, for documentation
> purposes.  Obviously the surrounding code didn't agree.

I just copied the surrounding code style. If you wish, I can put the
names for this function back.

BTW: would you prefer the followup "fix" patch or just the replacement
one?


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/