| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20080905105721.GD17776@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 12:57:21 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@...jp.nec.com>
Cc: Rui Sousa <rui.p.m.sousa@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATH] Fix compilation when CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT is
not set
* Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@...jp.nec.com> wrote:
> Rui Sousa wrote:
> > On Thursday 4 September 2008 19:14, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote:
> >> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >>> * Rui Sousa <rui.p.m.sousa@...il.com> wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> This patch fixes compilation if CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT is ever
> >>>> disabled (which is currently not allowed by Kconfig). Alternatively we
> >>>> could just remove the option altogether and the associated code paths.
> >>>> Since the compilation error has been in the tree for at least two
> >>>> years and no one noticed it, I guess we don't really have the need for
> >>>> CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT=n. Boot tested on x86 UP.
> >>> applied to tip/core/locking - thanks Rui.
> >>>
> >>> since you fixed it i prefer the fix over the removal. We could still
> >>> remove the !TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT now (in a separate commit) and
> >>> simpify this header a bit that way. Thus if someone needs the
> >>> !TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT mode of build for future work, it can be
> >>> restored via a simple revert.
> >> Hi, it seems that this patch breaks uml build.
> >
> > Hi Hiroshi,
> >
> >> kernel/printk.c: In function 'vprintk':
> >> kernel/printk.c:674: error: implicit declaration of function
> >> 'raw_local_irq_save' kernel/printk.c:772: error: implicit declaration of
> >> function 'raw_local_irq_restore'
> >
> > With the patch bellow it compiles (make ARCH=um with a x86 host), but I'm
> > really out of my league on this one...
>
> Hi Rui,
>
> with this patch, build and boot (on my x86_64 box) looks ok.
>
> I CC-ed to uml people to check this.
i've applied the fix below to tip/core/locking - but would be nice if
the UML folks had a comment as well.
Ingo
>From 8c56250f48347750c82ab18d98d647dcf99ca674 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rui Sousa <rui.p.m.sousa@...il.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 19:47:53 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] lockdep, UML: fix compilation when CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT is not set
Hiroshi Shimamoto reported:
> > !TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT mode of build for future work, it can be
> > restored via a simple revert.
>
> Hi, it seems that this patch breaks uml build.
>
> kernel/printk.c: In function 'vprintk':
> kernel/printk.c:674: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'raw_local_irq_save' kernel/printk.c:772: error: implicit declaration of
> function 'raw_local_irq_restore'
With the patch bellow it compiles (make ARCH=um with a x86 host), but I'm
really out of my league on this one...
Reported-by: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@...jp.nec.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
include/asm-um/system-generic.h | 32 ++++++++++++++++----------------
1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/asm-um/system-generic.h b/include/asm-um/system-generic.h
index 5bcfa35..f1ea4da 100644
--- a/include/asm-um/system-generic.h
+++ b/include/asm-um/system-generic.h
@@ -4,15 +4,15 @@
#include "asm/arch/system.h"
#undef switch_to
-#undef local_irq_save
-#undef local_irq_restore
-#undef local_irq_disable
-#undef local_irq_enable
-#undef local_save_flags
-#undef local_irq_restore
-#undef local_irq_enable
-#undef local_irq_disable
-#undef local_irq_save
+#undef raw_local_irq_save
+#undef raw_local_irq_restore
+#undef raw_local_irq_disable
+#undef raw_local_irq_enable
+#undef raw_local_save_flags
+#undef raw_local_irq_restore
+#undef raw_local_irq_enable
+#undef raw_local_irq_disable
+#undef raw_local_irq_save
#undef irqs_disabled
extern void *switch_to(void *prev, void *next, void *last);
@@ -23,21 +23,21 @@ extern int get_signals(void);
extern void block_signals(void);
extern void unblock_signals(void);
-#define local_save_flags(flags) do { typecheck(unsigned long, flags); \
+#define raw_local_save_flags(flags) do { typecheck(unsigned long, flags); \
(flags) = get_signals(); } while(0)
-#define local_irq_restore(flags) do { typecheck(unsigned long, flags); \
+#define raw_local_irq_restore(flags) do { typecheck(unsigned long, flags); \
set_signals(flags); } while(0)
-#define local_irq_save(flags) do { local_save_flags(flags); \
- local_irq_disable(); } while(0)
+#define raw_local_irq_save(flags) do { raw_local_save_flags(flags); \
+ raw_local_irq_disable(); } while(0)
-#define local_irq_enable() unblock_signals()
-#define local_irq_disable() block_signals()
+#define raw_local_irq_enable() unblock_signals()
+#define raw_local_irq_disable() block_signals()
#define irqs_disabled() \
({ \
unsigned long flags; \
- local_save_flags(flags); \
+ raw_local_save_flags(flags); \
(flags == 0); \
})
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists