[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <38b2ab8a0809050544l1914530clec53494e12c77ff5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 14:44:30 +0200
From: "Francis Moreau" <francis.moro@...il.com>
To: "Jean Delvare" <khali@...ux-fr.org>
Cc: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
i2c@...sensors.org
Subject: Re: qestion about I2C_CLASS_HWMON flag
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 10:57:56 +0200, Francis Moreau wrote:
ags probably are useful, but they're are hard coded in adapters...
>
> Nothing prevents you from setting the class flags based on
> platform-specific information if you have a need for that.
>
Just to be sure, do you mean by hacking the adapter source code ?
> That being said, in cases where you have that level of information
> about which devices are present on the I2C bus,
Isn't the case for most of all embedded platforms ?
> you probably want to
> declare the I2C devices at the platform level, and not rely on probing
> at all (so .class is 0).
do you mean by using I2C_BOARD_INFO ?
Thanks
--
Francis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists