[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080905131244.GC3795@skl-net.de>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 15:12:44 +0200
From: Andre Noll <maan@...temlinux.org>
To: Andrew Patterson <andrew.patterson@...com>
Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
axboe@...nel.dk, andmike@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, mike.miller@...com,
genanr@...phone.com, jmoyer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] Adjust block device size after an online resize of a disk.
On 14:27, Andrew Patterson wrote:
> int revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
> {
> + struct block_device *bdev;
> int ret = 0;
>
> if (disk->fops->revalidate_disk)
> ret = disk->fops->revalidate_disk(disk);
Maybe we should return early at this point if revalidate_disk()
failed or fops->revalidate_disk is NULL.
> + bdev = bdget_disk(disk, 0);
> + if (!bdev)
> + return ret;
We might return success here even if bdev is NULL. OTOH, as the callers
of revalidate_disk() do not check the return value anyway (although at
least tapeblock_revalidate_disk() might return a negative value) it's
probably also an option to change the return type of revalidate_disk()
to void.
Andre
--
The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists