| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20080905063317.5e3a2b2c@infradead.org> Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 06:33:17 -0700 From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> To: Bernd Schubert <bs@...eap.de> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: frame unwinder patches On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 11:19:21 +0200 Bernd Schubert <bs@...eap.de> wrote: > > not printing the ? would be trivial (for some backtraces we do > > that), but so far hasn't been seen as desirable because you lose > > information in those hard-to-debug cases when you need anything you > > can get from the backtrace. > > I see your point, but in most cases it is rather annoying. ... if you see backtraces regularly there's something wrong ;-) (and if you really care it's 1 line of code to turn it off) -- If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@...ux.intel.com For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists