| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20080905071337.3373ab86@infradead.org> Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 07:13:37 -0700 From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> To: Bernd Schubert <bs@...eap.de> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> Subject: Re: frame unwinder patches On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 15:52:47 +0200 Bernd Schubert <bs@...eap.de> wrote: > > > > (and if you really care it's 1 line of code to turn it off) > > It is not only this, I think the dwarf2 stack unwinder patches > provide by far better traces than the in-kernel unwinder. At least > ever since I applied these patches to our kernels, I was able to read > the stack dumps... > they really wouldn't be different than the ones you get if you remove the "?" lines. -- If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@...ux.intel.com For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists