[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1220635120.11202.18.camel@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 19:18:40 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
marcin.slusarz@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixing section mismatch warning .
On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 21:43 +0600, Rakib Mullick wrote:
> LD kernel/built-in.o
> WARNING: kernel/built-in.o(.text+0x326): Section mismatch in reference
> from the function init_hrtick() to the variable
> ..cpuinit.data:hotplug_hrtick_nb.8
> The function init_hrtick() references
> the variable __cpuinitdata hotplug_hrtick_nb.8.
> This is often because init_hrtick lacks a __cpuinitdata
> annotation or the annotation of hotplug_hrtick_nb.8 is wrong.
>
> This patch fixes the above warning.
> Thanks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Md.Rakib H. Mullick (rakib.mullick@...il.com)
>
> --- linux-2.6.27-rc5.orig/kernel/sched.c 2008-08-31 17:07:03.000000000 +0600
> +++ linux-2.6.27-rc5/kernel/sched.c 2008-09-01 22:23:30.000000000 +0600
> @@ -1087,7 +1087,7 @@ hotplug_hrtick(struct notifier_block *nf
> return NOTIFY_DONE;
> }
>
> -static void init_hrtick(void)
> +static __init void init_hrtick(void)
> {
> hotcpu_notifier(hotplug_hrtick, 0);
> }
then, shouldn't it be __cpuinit ?
BTW - would've been nice to see sched mentioned in the topic.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists