linux-kernel - Re: [BUG] x86 kenel won't boot under Virtual PC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080905184353.GA29496@elte.hu>
Date:	Fri, 5 Sep 2008 20:43:53 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>, linux@...dersweb.net,
	Andi Kleen <andi-suse@...stfloor.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] x86 kenel won't boot under Virtual PC


* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

>  - Move the optimized nop definitions (K7_NOPx etc) to the only place that 
>    cares - asm/x86/kernel/alternative.c. When we do things _dynamically_, 
>    it can actually make sense to pick a nop more precisely, but for this 
>    whole static thing it's just a pain.
> 
> IOW, if it actually _worked_ reasonably, I wouldn't care. But clearly 
> it doesn't. And once it's not working reasonably, it should be fixed.

yes - we had 3-4 tries already and while it looked worthwile initially 
it's clearly not showing signs of getting more robust and whatever 
benefits there might be slightly better NOPs is dwarved by all these 
robustness problems. Peter?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/