[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080906182438.GC21872@elte.hu>
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2008 20:24:38 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Joe Korty <joe.korty@...r.com>
Cc: Leon Woestenberg <leon.woestenberg@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] shrink printk timestamp field
* Joe Korty <joe.korty@...r.com> wrote:
> >> Of course it's useful. If you're working on performance or latency
> >> in a disk, network or USB driver, microsecond resolution is about
> >> right.
> >
> > I second this. If we have timestamps enables, let it be useful for
> > all current uses. The 3 digits extra are very cheap useful
> > information in that area (without resorting to more elaborate
> > methods like the recently merged latency tracer).
> >
> > Rather than cut 3 digits off, maybe fix some of the too-wide prints
> > would solve the posters issue better.
> >
> > Can we please have this patch non-committed or reverted?
>
> I have no objection...
ok, i've zapped it from tip/core/printk.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists