lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2008 20:24:38 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> To: Joe Korty <joe.korty@...r.com> Cc: Leon Woestenberg <leon.woestenberg@...il.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] shrink printk timestamp field * Joe Korty <joe.korty@...r.com> wrote: > >> Of course it's useful. If you're working on performance or latency > >> in a disk, network or USB driver, microsecond resolution is about > >> right. > > > > I second this. If we have timestamps enables, let it be useful for > > all current uses. The 3 digits extra are very cheap useful > > information in that area (without resorting to more elaborate > > methods like the recently merged latency tracer). > > > > Rather than cut 3 digits off, maybe fix some of the too-wide prints > > would solve the posters issue better. > > > > Can we please have this patch non-committed or reverted? > > I have no objection... ok, i've zapped it from tip/core/printk. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists