linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] shrink printk timestamp field

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080906182438.GC21872@elte.hu>
Date:	Sat, 6 Sep 2008 20:24:38 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Joe Korty <joe.korty@...r.com>
Cc:	Leon Woestenberg <leon.woestenberg@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] shrink printk timestamp field


* Joe Korty <joe.korty@...r.com> wrote:

> >> Of course it's useful.  If you're working on performance or latency 
> >> in a disk, network or USB driver, microsecond resolution is about 
> >> right.
> >
> > I second this. If we have timestamps enables, let it be useful for 
> > all current uses. The 3 digits extra are very cheap useful 
> > information in that area (without resorting to more elaborate 
> > methods like the recently merged latency tracer).
> > 
> > Rather than cut 3 digits off, maybe fix some of the too-wide prints 
> > would solve the posters issue better.
> > 
> > Can we please have this patch non-committed or reverted?
> 
> I have no objection...

ok, i've zapped it from tip/core/printk.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/