lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.55.0809062104570.13851@cliff.in.clinika.pl>
Date:	Sat, 6 Sep 2008 21:08:51 +0100 (BST)
From:	"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
To:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
cc:	Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] x86: io-apic - code style cleaning for setup_IO_APIC_irqs

On Sat, 6 Sep 2008, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:

> So I think better would be just use Ingo's suggestion
> about to separate apic/pin iterator and function body.

 No doubt about it.  Then if the number of entries was to be huge, then
lines output to the log buffer could be limited to 80 characters.  With
the use of sprintf() it would be rather trivial.  And you would avoid any
concerns about stack consumption.

 Please note that with MPS 1.1 systems the number of "unconnected" I/O 
APIC inputs can be considerable.

  Maciej
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ