[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0809061430010.3117@nehalem.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:32:17 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
cc: Alok Kataria <akataria@...are.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Veen <arjan@...radead.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Dan Hecht <dhecht@...are.com>,
Garrett Smith <garrett@...are.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch 0/4] TSC calibration improvements
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> I didn't know that sending a test patch which is admittetly not pretty
> is a capital crime nowadays.
The thing is, there's a pattern to this. And it has nothing to do with
"test patch".
See commit fbb16e243887332dd5754e48ffe5b963378f3cd2, and then see what I
had to do in ec0c15afb41fd9ad45b53468b60db50170e22346.
That wasn't a test patch, was it?
I don't want to continually see these patches that are simply adding more
and more crap. I want to not have to clean up the end result afterwards.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists