linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] x86: signal works for unification

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:56:40 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@...jp.nec.com>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] x86: signal works for unification


* Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@...jp.nec.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> this patch series is for future unification of signal.c.
> These patches make common functions similar in signal_32|64.c.
> 
> Could you please review them?

looks good to me - it's fairly safely structured and also in small, 
single-purpose steps. If there's a problem with them bisection should 
give a very good clue about exactly where.

So i've created a new tip/x86/signal topic for them and applied them - 
lets see how it goes. Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/