[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48C43E30.6020504@xms.se>
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 22:48:48 +0200
From: "Jonas Petersson" <jonas.petersson@....se>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
CC: Owen Martin <omartin@...ezza.com>,
Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@...idpixels.com>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
smartmontools-support@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [smartmontools-support] exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0
action 0x2 frozen
For the record:
Jonas Petersson wrote:
> Owen Martin wrote:
> > This looks like a timeout during a read command:
> >
> > ata3.00: cmd c8/00:08:90:3c:59
> >
> > Read dma of 8 blocks from 0x903c59
> >
> > Next time it happens, see if it is the same LBA. Since the drive came
> > back after the bus reset makes me think it was probably in error
> > recovery for an extended amount of time.
>
> Sounds like a good idea. However, I had the drive swapped yesterday and
> have now reinstalled on a (seemingly) identical one which so far seems
> to be free from these messages. Hence, I keep my fingers crossed that
> this was indeed a hw error.
> [...]
I've now stressed the new disk for almost a week and seen no indication
at all to the previous error. Everything else is the same as before - I
even installed from the very same DVD. My conclusion is therefore that I
really had a disk that was broken in a way that normal tests will not
detect.
Hence, my tip to anyone having a similar experience: Don't blame the
driver, nor the motherboard/chipset - just replace the drive. It would
of course be even nicer if the error message could spell this out
somewhat clearer too, but I guess the "I/O error" in the middle is a
fair hint in retrospect.
Best / Jonas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists