lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080908131614.3221.36675.stgit@drishya.in.ibm.com>
Date:	Mon, 08 Sep 2008 18:46:14 +0530
From:	Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Suresh B Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Vatsa <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	David Collier-Brown <davecb@....com>,
	Tim Connors <tconnors@...ro.swin.edu.au>,
	Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com>,
	Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 1/7] sched: arch_reinit_sched_domains() must destroy
	domains to force rebuild

From: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com>

What I realized recently is that calling rebuild_sched_domains() in
arch_reinit_sched_domains() by itself is not enough when cpusets are enabled.
partition_sched_domains() code is trying to avoid unnecessary domain rebuilds
and will not actually rebuild anything if new domain masks match the old ones.

What this means is that doing
     echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/sched_mc_power_savings
on a system with cpusets enabled will not take affect untill something changes
in the cpuset setup (ie new sets created or deleted).

This patch fixes restore correct behaviour where domains must be rebuilt in
order to enable MC powersaving flags.

Test on quad-core Core2 box with both CONFIG_CPUSETS and !CONFIG_CPUSETS.
Also tested on dual-core Core2 laptop. Lockdep is happy and things are working
as expected.

Ingo, please apply.
btw We also need to push my other cpuset patch into mainline. We currently
calling rebuild_sched_domains() without cgroup lock which is bad. When I made
original sched: changes the assumption was that cpuset patch will also go in.
I'm talking about
	"cpuset: Rework sched domains and CPU hotplug handling"
It's been ACKed by Paul has been in the -tip for awhile now.

Reference LKML threads:

http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/29/191
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/29/343

Signed-off-by: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com>
Cc: svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: peterz@...radead.org
Cc: mingo@...e.hu
Tested-by: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---

 include/linux/cpuset.h |    2 +-
 kernel/sched.c         |   19 +++++++++++++------
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/cpuset.h b/include/linux/cpuset.h
index e8f450c..2691926 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpuset.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpuset.h
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ static inline int current_cpuset_is_being_rebound(void)
 
 static inline void rebuild_sched_domains(void)
 {
-	partition_sched_domains(0, NULL, NULL);
+	partition_sched_domains(1, NULL, NULL);
 }
 
 #endif /* !CONFIG_CPUSETS */
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 9a1ddb8..5a38540 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -7637,24 +7637,27 @@ static int dattrs_equal(struct sched_domain_attr *cur, int idx_cur,
  * and partition_sched_domains() will fallback to the single partition
  * 'fallback_doms', it also forces the domains to be rebuilt.
  *
+ * If doms_new==NULL it will be replaced with cpu_online_map.
+ * ndoms_new==0 is a special case for destroying existing domains.
+ * It will not create the default domain.
+ *
  * Call with hotplug lock held
  */
 void partition_sched_domains(int ndoms_new, cpumask_t *doms_new,
 			     struct sched_domain_attr *dattr_new)
 {
-	int i, j;
+	int i, j, n;
 
 	mutex_lock(&sched_domains_mutex);
 
 	/* always unregister in case we don't destroy any domains */
 	unregister_sched_domain_sysctl();
 
-	if (doms_new == NULL)
-		ndoms_new = 0;
+	n = doms_new ? ndoms_new : 0;
 
 	/* Destroy deleted domains */
 	for (i = 0; i < ndoms_cur; i++) {
-		for (j = 0; j < ndoms_new; j++) {
+		for (j = 0; j < n; j++) {
 			if (cpus_equal(doms_cur[i], doms_new[j])
 			    && dattrs_equal(dattr_cur, i, dattr_new, j))
 				goto match1;
@@ -7667,7 +7670,6 @@ match1:
 
 	if (doms_new == NULL) {
 		ndoms_cur = 0;
-		ndoms_new = 1;
 		doms_new = &fallback_doms;
 		cpus_andnot(doms_new[0], cpu_online_map, cpu_isolated_map);
 		dattr_new = NULL;
@@ -7704,8 +7706,13 @@ match2:
 int arch_reinit_sched_domains(void)
 {
 	get_online_cpus();
+
+	/* Destroy domains first to force the rebuild */
+	partition_sched_domains(0, NULL, NULL);
+
 	rebuild_sched_domains();
 	put_online_cpus();
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -7789,7 +7796,7 @@ static int update_sched_domains(struct notifier_block *nfb,
 	case CPU_ONLINE_FROZEN:
 	case CPU_DEAD:
 	case CPU_DEAD_FROZEN:
-		partition_sched_domains(0, NULL, NULL);
+		partition_sched_domains(1, NULL, NULL);
 		return NOTIFY_OK;
 
 	default:

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ