[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48C54690.1060002@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:36:48 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux@...dersweb.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi-suse@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] x86 kenel won't boot under Virtual PC
Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> yes. X86_P6_NOPS is a totally insignificant optimization and if it makes
> _any_ CPU not boot (be that virtual or real), then it's frankly not
> worth it.
>
> David, exactly how does the kernel fail to boot with latest -git?
> (v2.6.27-rc5-313-g64f996f or later) Does detect_nopl() run? It really
> should, and it should detect the non-working instructions.
>
Okay, a few things here...
1. First, I wrote up a patch yesterday to update the CONFIG_X86_GENERIC
description and to make it "default y". It is currently on
x86/defconfig, but I think it should be promoted to mainline immediately.
2. X86_P6_NOPS is not the only source of static NOPLs. If gcc is set to
optimize for specific architectures, then gcc/binutils will generate
static NOPLs. The only way we can prevent that is by not using specific
-march options, as far as I can tell.
3. I'm not positive that CONFIG_X86_GENERIC currently avoid all cases of
(2), but it obviously should. I will verify that today and add a
followup patch to the Makefiles if necessary.
Given all of this, I really think that putting this on
CONFIG_X86_GENERIC, *AND* making CONFIG_X86_GENERIC the default is the
right choice.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists