[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48C54704.2040101@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:38:44 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux@...dersweb.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi-suse@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] x86 kenel won't boot under Virtual PC
Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> I thought you agreed that CPU virtualization can be a problem? That
>> was the whole excuse for why the dynamic code was changed. Why would
>> it not be true for the static code?
>>
>> The fact is, if you want to run on a Core2 or other modern CPU, then
>> "Virtual PC" is apparently buggy in this respect. You worked around it
>> for the dynamic choice - but that's totally _pointless_ if you then
>> don't want to work around it for the static one.
>
> yes. X86_P6_NOPS is a totally insignificant optimization and if it makes
> _any_ CPU not boot (be that virtual or real), then it's frankly not
> worth it.
>
> David, exactly how does the kernel fail to boot with latest -git?
> (v2.6.27-rc5-313-g64f996f or later) Does detect_nopl() run? It really
> should, and it should detect the non-working instructions.
>
It almost certainly never gets as far as detect_nopl().
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists