[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48C55C0A.7070203@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 10:08:26 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux@...dersweb.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi-suse@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] x86 kenel won't boot under Virtual PC
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Peter - does gcc actually use NOPL in _32-bit_ code too? It really seems
> to be a stupid decision to make a binary not run on other CPU's over
> something as trivial as that. That's something I'd expect out of an Intel
> compiler just to mess with AMD, not out of gcc.
>
Yes, it does:
/* We need to decide which NOP sequence to use for 32bit and
64bit. When -mtune= is used:
1. For PROCESSOR_I386, PROCESSOR_I486, PROCESSOR_PENTIUM and
PROCESSOR_GENERIC32, f32_patt will be used.
2. For PROCESSOR_PENTIUMPRO, PROCESSOR_PENTIUM4, PROCESSOR_NOCONA,
PROCESSOR_CORE, PROCESSOR_CORE2, and PROCESSOR_GENERIC64,
alt_long_patt will be used.
3. For PROCESSOR_ATHLON, PROCESSOR_K6, PROCESSOR_K8 and
PROCESSOR_AMDFAM10, alt_short_patt will be used.
When -mtune= isn't used, alt_long_patt will be used if
cpu_arch_isa_flags has Cpu686. Otherwise, f32_patt will
be used.
"alt_long_patt" uses NOPL and its variants.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists