[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48C57884.30607@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 12:09:56 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux@...dersweb.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] x86 kenel won't boot under Virtual PC
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>>
>> Yes, it does:
>>
>> /* We need to decide which NOP sequence to use for 32bit and
>> 64bit. When -mtune= is used:
>>
>> 1. For PROCESSOR_I386, PROCESSOR_I486, PROCESSOR_PENTIUM and
>> PROCESSOR_GENERIC32, f32_patt will be used.
>> 2. For PROCESSOR_PENTIUMPRO, PROCESSOR_PENTIUM4, PROCESSOR_NOCONA,
>> PROCESSOR_CORE, PROCESSOR_CORE2, and PROCESSOR_GENERIC64,
>> alt_long_patt will be used.
>> 3. For PROCESSOR_ATHLON, PROCESSOR_K6, PROCESSOR_K8 and
>> PROCESSOR_AMDFAM10, alt_short_patt will be used.
>>
>> When -mtune= isn't used, alt_long_patt will be used if
>> cpu_arch_isa_flags has Cpu686. Otherwise, f32_patt will
>> be used.
>>
>> "alt_long_patt" uses NOPL and its variants.
>
> That is A TOTAL PIECE OF SH*T, and against gcc's own documentation.
>
> "-mtune=x" is very much defined to be a performance _tuning_ option, not
> an "architectural" option.
>
> Quite frankly, this is a gcc bug. Plain and simple.
>
OK, digging some more into this garbage...
Apparently the situation isn't quite as dire as it first seems.
At least gcc 4.3.0 doesn't actually pass -mtune= to gas; it just drops
the option on the floor. This means this bug isn't manifest when
calling from gcc (as opposed to invoking as directly.)
However, I would still like to push the following patch to be on the
safe side, ok?
-hpa
View attachment "0002-x86-prevent-binutils-from-being-smart-and-generat.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (1347 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists