| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 21:03:52 +0100 From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> To: "linux-os (Dick Johnson)" <linux-os@...logic.com> Cc: "Greg KH" <gregkh@...e.de>, "Linux kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, <stable@...nel.org> Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.25.17 > If I remove one of the CPUs, there is no file-system corruption > so I fear that there is some lock missing somewhere in the > serial ATA driver code (ata_piix or sata_sil). All the logic and locking is in the core code so would show up on all sorts of boxes. You say you are using sata_sil - is this on an Nvidia board ? > If anybody has anything to test with my setup, I can readily > test both with and without the two CPUs. Can you duplicate this with the drives just on the ata_piix ? Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists