lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200809081632.26166.david-b@pacbell.net>
Date:	Mon, 8 Sep 2008 16:32:25 -0700
From:	David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix RTC_CLASS regression with PARISC

On Monday 08 September 2008, James Bottomley wrote:
> 
> > All the powerpc folks are doing is providing a dummy shim into the
> > RTC layer using their machine description vector, and not really using
> > the RTC layer drivers at all.
> 
> But realistically that's all we need.  Our RTC is controlled by two
> calls into firmware: a get and a set; nothing else.  We don't have the
> docs to get at the clock without the firmware calls.

True for PARISC ... but not for PowerPC.  Lots of PowerPC
system boards use off-the-shelf RTCs with more capabilities
than the machine description vector acknowledges.

- Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ