[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200809081632.26166.david-b@pacbell.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 16:32:25 -0700
From: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix RTC_CLASS regression with PARISC
On Monday 08 September 2008, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> > All the powerpc folks are doing is providing a dummy shim into the
> > RTC layer using their machine description vector, and not really using
> > the RTC layer drivers at all.
>
> But realistically that's all we need. Our RTC is controlled by two
> calls into firmware: a get and a set; nothing else. We don't have the
> docs to get at the clock without the firmware calls.
True for PARISC ... but not for PowerPC. Lots of PowerPC
system boards use off-the-shelf RTCs with more capabilities
than the machine description vector acknowledges.
- Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists