[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 18:21:16 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
CC: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] add is_buffer_dma_capable helper function
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 09:17:05AM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
> +static inline int is_buffer_dma_capable(u64 mask, dma_addr_t addr, size_t size)
> +{
> + return addr + size <= mask;
> +}
>
> Do we care about wrap-around (e.g. addr=0xffffffffffffffff size=2)?
I don't think so. The current code does not care about it and if it
happens its a bug in the iommu implementation.
Joerg
--
| AMD Saxony Limited Liability Company & Co. KG
Operating | Wilschdorfer Landstr. 101, 01109 Dresden, Germany
System | Register Court Dresden: HRA 4896
Research | General Partner authorized to represent:
Center | AMD Saxony LLC (Wilmington, Delaware, US)
| General Manager of AMD Saxony LLC: Dr. Hans-R. Deppe, Thomas McCoy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists