linux-kernel - Re: mmotm 2008-09-08-18-32 uploaded

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080910100142.e74ff1e5.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Wed, 10 Sep 2008 10:01:42 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mmotm 2008-09-08-18-32 uploaded

On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 10:37:41 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> > Following is comparison with a mmtom based on rc4.
> > ===
> > [rc4mm1]
> > Execl Throughput                           3004.4 lps   (29.6 secs, 3 samples)
> > C Compiler Throughput                      1017.9 lpm   (60.0 secs, 3 samples)
> > Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)               5726.3 lpm   (60.0 secs, 3 samples)
> > Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)               1124.3 lpm   (60.0 secs, 3 samples)
> > Shell Scripts (16 concurrent)               576.0 lpm   (60.0 secs, 3 samples)
> > Dc: sqrt(2) to 99 decimal places         125446.5 lpm   (30.0 secs, 3 samples)
> > 
> > [rc5mm1]
> > Execl Throughput                           3006.5 lps   (29.8 secs, 3 samples)
> > C Compiler Throughput                      1006.7 lpm   (60.0 secs, 3 samples)
> > Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)               4863.7 lpm   (60.0 secs, 3 samples)
> > Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                943.7 lpm   (60.0 secs, 3 samples)
> > Shell Scripts (16 concurrent)               482.7 lpm   (60.0 secs, 3 samples)
> > Dc: sqrt(2) to 99 decimal places         124804.9 lpm   (30.0 secs, 3 samples)
> > ==
> > 15% down in shell script test. Any idea ? (scheduler ?)
> 
> Dunno.  There is a largel number of debugging patches at the tail of
> the series so they should be the first thing to eliminate.
> 
But I compare mmtom and mmtom, both includes debug series at the tail of series.
I'll revisit this later.

Thanks,
-Kame  

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/