[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aa79d98a0809100353t3f995bb3hf658e1bc66eaac7a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:53:47 +0400
From: "Cyrill Gorcunov" <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: io-apic - get rid of __DO_ACTION macro
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> * Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:02 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 12:13 AM, Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
>> > ...
>> >>
>> >> hope we can keep using MACRO..
>> >>
>> >> YH
>> >>
>> >
>> > Btw, Yinghai, what does it mean? To not touch this macro at all?
>> > Or you mean about implementation issue (ie the design itself)?
>>
>> do not touch this macro... and may revisit after 2.6.28
>
> anything you are particularly worried about? Regressions we should be
> able to find pretty quickly, in a central macro like that - and the
> macro is quite ugly.
>
> Ingo
>
Btw Ingo, don't apply this patch for now - I'll simplify it a bit.
I just overzealous with masks operation - 'and' and 'or' will
be more then enough without checking. I think I will do it today evening
so Yinghai could review it and say if he like it. Anyway the
patch could be just queued to satisfy any concerns :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists