[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1KdNg3-0001N5-Al@be1.7eggert.dyndns.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 13:16:02 +0200
From: Bodo Eggert <7eggert@....de>
To: Mikhail Kshevetskiy <mikhail.kshevetskiy@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ayaz Abdulla <aabdulla@...dia.com>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>
Subject: Re: forcedeth: option to disable 100Hz timer (try 2)
Mikhail Kshevetskiy <mikhail.kshevetskiy@...il.com> wrote:
> On some hardware no TX done interrupts are generated, thus special
> 100Hz timer interrupt is required to handle this situation properly.
> Other device do not require that timer interrupt feature.
>
> Forcedeth has a DEV_NEED_TIMERIRQ flag to mark the broken devices.
> Unfortunately, nobody know the actual list of broken devices, so all
> device has this flag on. Other problem, this flag is not user visible,
> so the kernel recompilation is required to disable timer interrupts and
> test a device.
Why don't you disable the interrupt after the first TX_done interrupt
(no RX pending, no RX done)? Maybe you can printk "forcedeth device [x,y] does
not need timer interrupts, please send this line to you@...mple.org", too.
Maybe you can even disable it if no TX is to be done.
OTOH, this fix is available, it's possibly the best to use it for now.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists