[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080910124822.GG6329@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:48:22 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: avoid unnecessary low zone allocation in AMD IOMMU's alloc_coherent
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 09:38:11PM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:03:10 +0200
> Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com> wrote:
> > It needs a fix anyway and the
> > right solution here is to fall back to one of the software iommu
> > implementations. The stackable dma_ops patches I have currently in work
> > will do exactly that.
>
> I'm not sure you need the stackable dma_ops support. Calgary IOMMU had
> the same problem and already solved it with dma_ops-per-device option.
We need stackable dma_ops anyway for paravirt IOMMU support in KVM. And
they will fix this issue too.
> > These flags are already removed in the dma_alloc_coherent function which
> > calls this one. Further I think in the case of a remapping IOMMU like
>
> Not true about x86/tip/iommu. dma_alloc_coherent in dma-mapping.h does
> that so that swiotlb and pci-nommu don't need the gfp hack. Clearing
> the gfp flags is much simpler than setting up the flags correctly
> mainly because of the fallback device, setting up the flags is really
> difficult.
Yes, dma_alloc_coherent in dma-mapping.h clears the flags. And this
function also calls ops->alloc_coherent which points to the AMD IOMMUs
alloc_coherent function if the driver is in place.
Joerg
--
| AMD Saxony Limited Liability Company & Co. KG
Operating | Wilschdorfer Landstr. 101, 01109 Dresden, Germany
System | Register Court Dresden: HRA 4896
Research | General Partner authorized to represent:
Center | AMD Saxony LLC (Wilmington, Delaware, US)
| General Manager of AMD Saxony LLC: Dr. Hans-R. Deppe, Thomas McCoy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists