linux-kernel - Re: Block: Trouble with kobject initialisation for blk_cmd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 10 Sep 2008 11:43:37 +0900
From:	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
To:	eo@...ensachen.de
Cc:	jens.axboe@...cle.com, fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp,
	greg@...ah.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Block: Trouble with kobject initialisation for blk_cmd_filter

On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:57:05 +0200
Elias Oltmanns <eo@...ensachen.de> wrote:

> Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 09 2008, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> [...]
> >> The sysfs changes looks too much for 2.6.27-rcX but without the sysfs
> >> changes, we have the cmdfilter under /sys/block/sda/queue/, right? We
> >> don't need to worry about compatibility, but /sys/block/sda is more
> >> appropriate? (though I don't think that the cmd filter is a good idea
> >> so I don't care much).
> >
> > I agree, under sda/ makes a lot more sense than under sda/queue/
> 
> Well, but why is it in struct request_queue then? Is it going to be
> moved back to the gendisk eventually?

I don't think that we can. It broke many things so I moved it to
request_queue.

http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=121706317031777&w=2


Well, it turned out that it doesn't work too... Sorry about that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/