linux-kernel - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 1 of 7] x86: add _PAGE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 10 Sep 2008 10:27:39 -0700
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
CC:	Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Xen Devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 1 of 7] x86: add _PAGE_IOMAP pte flag
 for IO mappings

Nick Piggin wrote:
> It complements vm_normal_page, which was there first (and coined by
> Linus). It is the opposite of normal. This question always comes up
> and my answer is always yes, if you can convince Linus to rename
> vm_normal_page to the corresponding term :)
>   

Not really.  Normal is normal, but "special" doesn't tell us what kind
of special it is.

> It's not exactly _PAGE_NOSTRUCTPAGE. There can be struct pages under
> there, but you're not to touch them.
>   

To the extent that the struct page may as well not exist?  Does it
contain any meaningful state?  Are they always IO mappings?  Could we
just use _PAGE_IOMAP as the name for _PAGE_SPECIAL?

>>>   And not having a struct page should correspond well to a pte not
>>> requiring pfn->mfn conversion and being an I/O page.
>>>       
>> But _PAGE_SPECIAL is only set in a few places.  It's not set in ioremap
>> mappings and so on.  Should it be?
>>     
>
> Kernel address space, you mean? No, it is only ever used on user
> addresses.
>   

Right.  But if we fold _PAGE_SPECIAL and _PAGE_IOMAP together, it would
start getting used on kernel addresses (and obviously we'd need to
rearrange _PAGE_CPA_TEST).

>> There's also the hiccup that it gets set in a pte with pte_mkspecial() -
>> but at that point its too late because you've already constructed the
>> pte and done the pfn->mfn conversion.  _PAGE_IOMAP can only be set when
>> you initially construct the pte out of a frame number and a pgprot.
>>     
>
> I don't see this would be any problem because the pte is always constructed
> in a single line in both places where it is used.
>   

OK.  If we were to fold these two together, then pte_mkspecial() would
have to go, since it wouldn't possible to use correctly in my use case.

    J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/