[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080910173442.GB31942@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:34:42 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "Ma, Chinang" <chinang.ma@...el.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
"Wilcox, Matthew R" <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>,
"Tripathi, Sharad C" <sharad.c.tripathi@...el.com>,
"Chilukuri, Harita" <harita.chilukuri@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.27-rc5 OLTP performance regression
* Ma, Chinang <chinang.ma@...el.com> wrote:
> I increased the /proc/sys/kernel/sched_shares_ratelimit from 1
> millisecond to one second to reduce the frequency of shares update.
> That was okay for OLTP workload. As Peter mentioned, a larger value
> will reduce the accuracy of SMP fairness for group scheduler and the
> ratelimit and using a larger default value may not be good for general
> case.
does 10 msecs already get you most of the 2%? 1000 millisecond sounds
very (and probably unacceptable) coarse.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists