lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080910181950.GC8067@lenovo>
Date:	Wed, 10 Sep 2008 22:19:50 +0400
From:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: io-apic - get rid of __DO_ACTION macro

[Yinghai Lu - Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:30:39AM -0700]
| On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 2:31 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
| >
| > * Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
| >
| >> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:02 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com> wrote:
| >> > On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 12:13 AM, Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
| >> > ...
| >> >>
| >> >> hope we can keep using MACRO..
| >> >>
| >> >> YH
| >> >>
| >> >
| >> > Btw, Yinghai, what does it mean? To not touch this macro at all?
| >> > Or you mean about implementation issue (ie the design itself)?
| >>
| >> do not touch this macro... and may revisit after 2.6.28
| >
| > anything you are particularly worried about? Regressions we should be
| > able to find pretty quickly, in a central macro like that - and the
| > macro is quite ugly.
| >
| 
| ok, let remove unneeded "if", and use function pointer...
| 
| void (*extra_action_t)(struct irq_pin_list *entry);
| 
| +static inline void io_apic_modify_irq(unsigned int irq,
| +                               int mask_and, int mask_or,
| +                               int mask_and_not, extra_action_t action)
| +{
| +       int pin;
| +       struct irq_cfg *cfg;
| +       struct irq_pin_list *entry;
| +       cfg = irq_cfg(irq);
| +       for (entry = cfg->irq_2_pin; entry != NULL; entry = entry->next) {
| +               unsigned int reg;
| +               pin = entry->pin;
| +               reg = io_apic_read(entry->apic, 0x10 + pin * 2);
| +               reg &= mask_and;
| +               reg |= mask_or;
| +               reg &= ~mask_and_not;
| +               io_apic_modify(entry->apic, 0x10 + pin * 2, reg);
| +               if (action)
| +                       action(entry);
| +       }
| +}
| 
| +void extra_read(struct irq_pin_list *entry)
| +             {
| +                       /*
| +                        * Synchronize the IO-APIC and the CPU by doing
| +                        * a dummy read from the IO-APIC
| +                        */
| +                       struct io_apic __iomem *io_apic;
| +                       io_apic = io_apic_base(entry->apic);
| +                       readl(&io_apic->data);
| +               }
| 
| 
| YH
| 

Yinghai, Ingo, what about this one?

		- Cyrill -
---
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Subject: x86: io-apic - get rid of __DO_ACTION macro v3

Replace __DO_ACTION macro with io_apic_modify_irq function.
This allow us to 'grep' definitions being hided by
__DO_ACTION macro:

	__unmask_IO_APIC_irq
	__mask_IO_APIC_irq
	__mask_and_edge_IO_APIC_irq
	__unmask_and_level_IO_APIC_irq

Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
CC: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
---

Index: linux-2.6.git/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.git.orig/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c	2008-09-09 22:27:57.000000000 +0400
+++ linux-2.6.git/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c	2008-09-10 22:17:25.000000000 +0400
@@ -643,65 +643,66 @@ static void __init replace_pin_at_irq(un
 		add_pin_to_irq(irq, newapic, newpin);
 }
 
-#define __DO_ACTION(R, ACTION_ENABLE, ACTION_DISABLE, FINAL)		\
-									\
-{									\
-	int pin;							\
-	struct irq_cfg *cfg;						\
-	struct irq_pin_list *entry;					\
-									\
-	cfg = irq_cfg(irq);						\
-	entry = cfg->irq_2_pin;						\
-	for (;;) {							\
-		unsigned int reg;					\
-		if (!entry)						\
-			break;						\
-		pin = entry->pin;					\
-		reg = io_apic_read(entry->apic, 0x10 + R + pin*2);	\
-		reg ACTION_DISABLE;					\
-		reg ACTION_ENABLE;					\
-		io_apic_modify(entry->apic, 0x10 + R + pin*2, reg);	\
-		FINAL;							\
-		if (!entry->next)					\
-			break;						\
-		entry = entry->next;					\
-	}								\
-}
-
-#define DO_ACTION(name,R, ACTION_ENABLE, ACTION_DISABLE, FINAL)		\
-									\
-	static void name##_IO_APIC_irq (unsigned int irq)		\
-	__DO_ACTION(R, ACTION_ENABLE, ACTION_DISABLE, FINAL)
+static inline void io_apic_modify_irq(unsigned int irq,
+				int mask_and, int mask_or,
+				void (*final)(struct irq_pin_list *entry))
+{
+	int pin;
+	struct irq_cfg *cfg;
+	struct irq_pin_list *entry;
 
-/* mask = 0 */
-DO_ACTION(__unmask,	0, |= 0, &= ~IO_APIC_REDIR_MASKED, )
+	cfg = irq_cfg(irq);
+	for (entry = cfg->irq_2_pin; entry != NULL; entry = entry->next) {
+		unsigned int reg;
+		pin = entry->pin;
+		reg = io_apic_read(entry->apic, 0x10 + pin * 2);
+		reg &= mask_and;
+		reg |= mask_or;
+		io_apic_modify(entry->apic, 0x10 + pin * 2, reg);
+		if (final)
+			final(entry);
+	}
+}
+
+static void __unmask_IO_APIC_irq(unsigned int irq)
+{
+	io_apic_modify_irq(irq, ~IO_APIC_REDIR_MASKED, 0, NULL);
+}
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
-/*
- * Synchronize the IO-APIC and the CPU by doing
- * a dummy read from the IO-APIC
- */
-static inline void io_apic_sync(unsigned int apic)
+void io_apic_sync(struct irq_pin_list *entry)
 {
-	struct io_apic __iomem *io_apic = io_apic_base(apic);
+	/*
+	 * Synchronize the IO-APIC and the CPU by doing
+	 * a dummy read from the IO-APIC
+	 */
+	struct io_apic __iomem *io_apic;
+	io_apic = io_apic_base(entry->apic);
 	readl(&io_apic->data);
 }
 
-/* mask = 1 */
-DO_ACTION(__mask,	0, |= IO_APIC_REDIR_MASKED, &= ~0, io_apic_sync(entry->apic))
-
-#else
-
-/* mask = 1 */
-DO_ACTION(__mask,	0, |= IO_APIC_REDIR_MASKED, &= ~0, )
-
-/* mask = 1, trigger = 0 */
-DO_ACTION(__mask_and_edge, 0, |= IO_APIC_REDIR_MASKED, &= ~IO_APIC_REDIR_LEVEL_TRIGGER, )
+static void __mask_IO_APIC_irq(unsigned int irq)
+{
+	io_apic_modify_irq(irq, ~0, IO_APIC_REDIR_MASKED, &io_apic_sync);
+}
+#else /* CONFIG_X86_32 */
+static void __mask_IO_APIC_irq(unsigned int irq)
+{
+	io_apic_modify_irq(irq, ~0, IO_APIC_REDIR_MASKED, NULL);
+}
 
-/* mask = 0, trigger = 1 */
-DO_ACTION(__unmask_and_level, 0, |= IO_APIC_REDIR_LEVEL_TRIGGER, &= ~IO_APIC_REDIR_MASKED, )
+static void __mask_and_edge_IO_APIC_irq(unsigned int irq)
+{
+	io_apic_modify_irq(irq, ~IO_APIC_REDIR_LEVEL_TRIGGER,
+			IO_APIC_REDIR_MASKED, NULL);
+}
 
-#endif
+static void __unmask_and_level_IO_APIC_irq(unsigned int irq)
+{
+	io_apic_modify_irq(irq, ~IO_APIC_REDIR_MASKED,
+			IO_APIC_REDIR_LEVEL_TRIGGER, NULL);
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_X86_32 */
 
 static void mask_IO_APIC_irq (unsigned int irq)
 {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ