[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48C78246.7050507@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 11:46:06 +0330
From: "Hamid R. Jahanjou" <hamid.jahanjou@...il.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
CC: Zan Lynx <zlynx@....org>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] VM: Implements the swap-out page-clustering technique
Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 18:28:30 -0600
> Zan Lynx <zlynx@....org> wrote:
>
>> Rik van Riel wrote:
>> [cut]
>>
>>> On the other hand, you do want to avoid evicting data
>>> that the process is still using, just because you are
>>> swapping out a not recently referenced page on a
>>> nearby virtual address.
>>>
>> How about writing the nearby pages to swap anyway and mark the still
>> in-use pages as SwapCache.
>>
>
> That is what will happen pretty much automatically.
>
I agree. As you said, we have two conflicting requirements here: on the
one hand one likes to swap as many pages as to satisfy the backing
storage "proper block IO size," on the other hand, one should not make a
process lose too many pages. The code needs tuning really, I'm going to
rewrite it making it more flexible according to the suggestion given on
the mailing list.
> Another thing the swap out page clustering code could
> do is move pages that were recently referenced back
> to the active list, so the VM will not have to scan
> those pages again.
>
>
I think this is a very good idea, actually the code does this already.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists