linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] Globally defining phys_addr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 11 Sep 2008 11:53:11 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc:	Alex Nixon <alex.nixon@...rix.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Globally defining phys_addr_t


* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:

> Hi Ingo,
> 
> This is a repost of a little 3-patch series which Andrew has been 
> carrying in -mm.  It cleans up the definition of phys_addr_t to make 
> it kernel-wide rather than x86-specific, and fixes up PFN_PHYS() to 
> use it to avoid address truncation.
> 
> We currently have a few workarounds for this problem in the tree, but 
> Alex found another bug caused by PFN_PHYS(), so it's probably better 
> if you bring these patches into tip.git for now.
> 
> PowerPC also defines a phys_addr_t with the same meaning as x86; the 
> powerpc arch maintainers are happy with these patches.

Andrew, are you fine with that approach too?

Also, i dont see Andrew's signoffs in the patches, and that's the true 
path of these patches which should be preserved: you => -mm => -tip.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/