[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080911134042.GB3293@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 06:40:42 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Thierry Vignaud <tvignaud@...driva.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, dwmw2@...radead.org,
jeffm@...e.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: Allow release-specific firmware dir
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 01:29:46PM +0200, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
> David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:
>
> > > This isn't compatible with the version of udev that people actually have
> > > installed, today. And it's also the _wrong_ thing to do.
> > >
> > > Firmware really _isn't_ version-specific.
> >
> > Tell that to every Debian and Debian derived system on the planet.
> >
> > To my knowledge, it is only fedora and possibly one or two other dists
> > that put the firmware files in a unary /lib/firmware location, rather
> > than a versioned /lib/firmware/$KERNELRELASE one.
>
> We (Mandriva Linux) do too.
> Why other distro cannot package firmware separatly for all their kernel
> flavors?
>
> Firmware are not version-specific.
Yes it is, when it is bundled with the kernel source tree itself.
Why do people not realize this?
This is a real problem for distros, and for anyone who wants to have
multiple kernel versions on a single machine. Jeff's patch fixes this.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists