linux-kernel - Re: Re: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 8/9] memcg: remove page

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <14174529.1221145313517.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Fri, 12 Sep 2008 00:01:53 +0900 (JST)
From:	kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com
To:	kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com
Cc:	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, xemul@...nvz.org, hugh@...itas.com,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, menage@...gle.com
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 8/9] memcg: remove page_cgroup pointer from memmap

>>On Thursday 11 September 2008 21:22, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
>>> Remove page_cgroup pointer from struct page.
>>>
>>> This patch removes page_cgroup pointer from struct page and make it be abl
e
>>> to get from pfn. Then, relationship of them is
>>>
>>> Before this:
>>>   pfn <-> struct page <-> struct page_cgroup.
>>> After this:
>>>   struct page <-> pfn -> struct page_cgroup -> struct page.
>>
>>So...
>>
>>pfn -> *hash* -> struct page_cgroup, right?
>>
>right.
>
>>While I don't think there is anything wrong with the approach, I
>>don't understand exactly where you guys are hoping to end up with
>>this?
>>
>No. but this is simple. I'd like to use linear mapping like
>sparsemem-vmemmap and HUGTLB kernel pages at the end.
>But it needs much more work and should be done in the future.
>(And it seems to have to depend on SPARSEMEM.)
>This is just a generic one.
>
This is my thinking, now.

Adding a patch for FLATMEM is very easy, maybe. (Just Do as Balbir's one.)

Adding a patch for DISCONTIGMEM is doubtful. I'm not sure how it's widely
used now.

When it comes to SPARSEMEM, our target is 64bit arch and we need 
SPARSEMEM_EXTREME...2 level table. Maybe not far different from current hash.

Our way should be linear mapping like SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP. But it needs
arch dependent code and some difficulty to allocate virtual space,
which can be very Huge.
This should be updated one by one (for each arch.).

Thanks,
-Kame




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/