[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1221149561.6309.33.camel@californication>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:12:41 +0200
From: Marcel Holtmann <holtmann@...ux.intel.com>
To: Faidon Liambotis <paravoid@...ian.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, dwmw2@...radead.org,
jeffm@...e.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: Allow release-specific firmware dir
Hi Faidon,
> > it is that the Debian maintainer screwed this up. Upstream never
> > promoted kernel versioned directories for the firmware. I had a long
> > discussion with Dave about it at OLS and using the kernel version is
> > just plain wrong. The driver maintainers should version the firmware if
> > they break it in an API incompatible way.
> >
> > To shed some light into the problem with Debian/Ubuntu. They install the
> > firmware in /lib/firmware/`uname -r`/ and everytime they bump their ABI
> > number, they have to install all the firmware again. This is just
> > braindead. Their udev script actually checks /lib/firmware first and
> > then the kernel versioned directory. So that is just fine.
> I could not find any packages in Debian that contain a
> /lib/firmware/$(KERNELRELEASE) directory.
>
> Perhaps this is just an Ubuntu issue?
I looked through my Debian boxes and you are right. Sorry for this. I
was under the assumption Ubuntu took the Debian package, but it seems
that they even modified that one. So this issue is than distros derived
from Ubuntu and _not_ Debian (unless udev is unmodified).
Regards
Marcel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists