[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080911185647.GA20188@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:56:47 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6 of 7] x86: use early_ioremap in __acpi_map_table
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > the false positive should be avoided, for example by unmapping the
> > 'prev' mapping shortly before the leak check.
> >
>
> Yep. I'll make it unmap just before setting acpi_gbl_permanent_mmap,
> which is when it switches to using plain old ioremap.
>
> >> (All those other backtraces are just informational, right?)
> >>
> >
> > no, they cause hard failures in my test setup. Nor do we want to litter
> > the bootup log with messages that are not correct.
> >
>
> No, I mean that early_ioremap_debug causes all early_ioremap()s to
> dump a stack trace, so most of the stack dumps in the boot log are
> diagnostic/informational rather than indications of lots of problems.
ah - now i understand what you mean, sure. The only non-diagnostic
message that the test barfed on was the leak warning itself. The others
were there because i did a second boot with the diagnostic messages
enabled as well. (so that there's a full track of what is mapped where)
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists