[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48C863CC.3010902@shaw.ca>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:18:20 -0600
From: Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Mikhail Kshevetskiy <mikhail.kshevetskiy@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, aabdulla@...dia.com,
jgarzik@...ox.com
Subject: Re: forcedeth: option to disable 100Hz timer (try 2)
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 23:34:35 +0400
> Mikhail Kshevetskiy <mikhail.kshevetskiy@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> On some hardware no TX done interrupts are generated, thus special
>> 100Hz timer interrupt is required to handle this situation properly.
>> Other device do not require that timer interrupt feature.
>>
>> Forcedeth has a DEV_NEED_TIMERIRQ flag to mark the broken devices.
>> Unfortunately, nobody know the actual list of broken devices, so all
>> device has this flag on. Other problem, this flag is not user visible,
>> so the kernel recompilation is required to disable timer interrupts and
>> test a device.
>>
>> This patch add a "disable_timerirq" option to disable interrupt
>> timer mentioned above. This may be extremely useful for laptop users.
>
> Why do you feel that the timer-based completions need to be disabled?
> Is it causing some problem?
100 unnecessary CPU wakeups per second imposes some power usage cost,
especially on laptops with CPU C-states..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists