lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48C8BB57.9020704@euromail.se>
Date:	Thu, 11 Sep 2008 08:31:51 +0200
From:	Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se>
To:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
CC:	akpm@...l.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] input: mousedev: Emulate right and middle buttons
 for single-button touchpads

Henrik Rydberg wrote:
>>> Regarding the tapping patch; it is addressing the correctness of
>>> already implemented functionality. I can see nothing wrong with that.
>>>
>> My position that since the isssue can be "fixed" by simply installing
>> the proper X driver I'd rather not include it. Mousedev purpose is to
>> provide good enough emulation in absence of a native driver and that's
>> it. Also, the default value would not work well on high-resiolution
>> devices (like Synaptics) and would require user fiddling with kernel
>> parameters - not worth it in my opinion.
> 
> The parameter could be made dimensionless and the distance test scaled
> with the size of the device; the argument invalidates the current patch,
> but not the idea itself. Maybe the patch will appear in acceptable form
> at some point, but for now, I rest my case.

Actually, the tap_move parameter is already dimensionless - the
mousedev_touchpad functions emulates movements on an imaginary screen
of resolution 256x256. Thus, with the following description change

-MODULE_PARM_DESC(tap_move, "Tap distance for touchpads in absolute mode (res)");
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(tap_move, "Tap move radius (256 * fraction of screen)");

it should be clear that the parameter does not depend on device resolution.
It could even be made a constant in the code, if that is preferred.

Henrik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ